On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 23:39 +0400, Maxim Udushlivy wrote: > Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > > So, the attitude we can expect from a person whom wants to contribute > > something to GNOME in terms of organisation and policies is to try and > > understand the current organisation, policies and goals; and only after > > that, proposing to change something (complete with a nice road map and > > rationales for every point). > > > > Ciao, > > Emmanuele. > > > > > Hi, thanks for directions. :-) > My main suggestion is a position of a Gnome Moderator. It's difficult to > prove his importance with a roadmap since it is only possible to appeal > to a common sense and imagination: graphs won't help. By the way, here > is a good description: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forum_moderator
GNOME is like a commune. Everyone involved in the community is at some level, a moderator. We don't need an official "moderator" person. What a boring job that would be. > My next point is that Gnome and GTK+ should part their ways (like Qt and > KDE which are separate entities). I tried to explain rationales in my > letter: > http://www.mail-archive.com/desktop-devel-list@gnome.org/msg06771.html GNOME and GTK+ *ARE* separate. GNOME is a platform that depends on GTK+. KDE is a platform that depends on QT. What's the difference here? -- dobey _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list