<quote who="Elijah Newren"> > Um, oops... Richard just pointed out to me how I had forgotten that Vytas > had done a very good job making the GUnique library work as well as > possible with gtk+-2.10. So, you can still implement it this cycle. Some > notes: > > 1) Richard has imported the GUnique library as libgunique in cvs; he has > been applying some patches to improve it and will be applying some more > (e.g. to make it a shared library).
Before recommending that everyone use GUnique, could we define a migration path for it to enter the platform? We really don't need yet another shared library, and yet another module to release, and yet another separate API to learn. Is this API appropriate for GTK+ and adaptable for use with Windows and OS X? Can we use it as-is (or as well-defined cut'n'paste code) in GNOME 2.18 and plan towards migrating to a GTK+ 2.12 version in GNOME 2.20? Let's at least have a plan for it, otherwise we're just adding yet another [as above] with little active thought for our users, distributors and platform consumers. Thanks, - Jeff -- Ohio LinuxFest 2006: Columbus OH, USA http://www.ohiolinux.org/ "Laughter is a force for democracy." - John Cleese _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list