On 9/22/06, Elijah Newren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/22/06, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Don't get me wrong, it is of course great to have the latest bugfixes and > > get > > dbus release candidates widely tested, but if the focus is on answering the > > question: "can Gnome x.y be deployed on z ?" we should look at the hard > > requirements (as in can not work with a version older than...). Maybe > > we should split the list of external dependencies into required and > > recommended versions. Then we could have e.g. a required dbus-glib > > version of 0.70, but recommend 0.71. > > Sounds good to me...
And done -- http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointSeventeen/ExternalDependencies has been split into minimum versions and recommended versions, with the minimum versions being lowered for the three tarballs you pointed out and the recommended versions being bumped higher for the important ones Kjartan pointed out. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list