On 12/11/06, Kjartan Maraas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > søn, 10.12.2006 kl. 18.36 -0700, skrev Elijah Newren: > > On 12/5/06, Carlos Garnacho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I just learnt that liboobs is considered an external dependency, I > > > (naively?) thought that it was a desktop module, given that it contains > > > 90% of the logical weight of g-s-t and based on a brief conversation > > > with the release team some time ago [1]. > > > > > > Maybe should liboobs be considered a Desktop module? > > > > Yes, this looks like an oversight. Given that it contains what was > > part of g-s-t previously I think that makes sense. Thanks for > > pointing this out. > > > Does this go for libgnomekbd too then since that was part of > gnome-control-center before being split out?
Yes, I think so. Unless there are any objections... :) _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
