My personal reaction is that it would be more useful to have a GNOME "distribution" (such as something jhbuild or garnome derived) which can act as a testbed of next-generation technologies - and where people can happily make different modules work together, or swap out the panel for something else, for example - than to take a selection of modules and put them in another formal release set.
Another release set opens a real can of worms - what's the criteria for inclusion? Are we creating an artificial barrier that a cool project has to get over before it is taken seriously? Would any degree of conformity to a 6-month cycle would be expected - this could just be a pain for modules that want to focus on breaking everything together while they still can. My 2p. -- Andrew _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
