On 9/16/07, Mikael Hallendal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 16 sep 2007 kl. 04.40 skrev Curtis Hovey: > > > On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 21:44 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > >> On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 01:10 +0200, Ali Sabil wrote: > >> - Keith Packard did a fairly extensive research of which DSCM > >> system > >> to use for xorg and other fd.o projects, from a storage robustness / > >> performance point of view, and he wrote this excellent piece: > >> > >> http://keithp.com/blog/Repository_Formats_Matter.html > > > > This document is a year old; projects that are under heavy development > > like Bazaar are misrepresented. For instance bzr has changed it's > > repository format, and is much faster that it was a year ago. > > In fairness, so is Git. It's perceived complexity is to a large part > based on people trying it out a long time ago while it is as well > being developed and higher level abstractions are added. >
Yes to be fair Git evolved a lot during those two last years, but even with all the changes and improvement git received, it is still hard to use, I gave it a try 3 months ago (with 1.5.x), usability wise it is far far behind bzr at least, but it looked also far behind Mercurial. Cheers, -- Ali _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list