On 9/19/07, Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 00:02 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote: > > > > There is no rational reason why GNOME would need both ChangeLog and > > svn log. > > There *is* a clear reason: offline and tarball use. What you really > mean is that there is no rational reason why GNOME can't use > auto-generated ChangeLog.
Yes. > One reason is: for previous commits. Moving > to a generated ChangeLog means losing a certain piece of history because > many modules have crap log in their history... Yes. Problem is solved by moving the old ChangeLog. svn mv ChangeLog ChangeLog-pre-X-Y, isn't it? Let me restate: There is no rational reason why GNOME projects would need to *update* a ChangeLog file at each and every commit to a project. -- mvh Björn _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
