On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 11:43 +0000, Alberto Ruiz wrote: > > > 2007/12/2, Elijah Newren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Dec 2, 2007 3:46 PM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In case anyone is interested, feel free to try out a 100% > WAF-ied > > version of gnome-python: > > > > http://www.gnome.org/~gjc/gnome-python-2.21.0.tar.bz2 > > > > The WAF based tarball (including a self contained waf > script, which is > > all you need to build) is 249K, while an autotools version > is 424K. I > > could reduce the size even more if I removed configure.ac > and the > > Makefile.am's. It also builds much faster, especially if > you count > > the ./autogen.sh part, though I didn't to get actual > numbers. > > Ooh, I'd love to see timing numbers. The size differences are > pretty > impressive; it would likely make a noticable impact on times > for > building releases for garnome users, release team members, and > others. > Anyone want to cook up a patch for libwnck/metacity so I can > see how > quick and small it is on my module(s)? (Hey, if I'm too lazy > to deal > with autotools for my modules and almost always delegate it, I > can > also be too lazy to deal with any other system, right?) > > I might try. > > So far, libwnck looks pretty simple, except for the glib-mkenums which > seems to call a lot of shell commands. > > What's exactly glib-mkenum used for? (I kind of guess from the name, > but I would like to have more background of the problem that it > solves). > Does anyone has done this mkenum thing with waf already?
I never used it (don't need it) but I think it is in waf already. PackageKit uses it. -- Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "The universe is always one step beyond logic" -- Frank Herbert _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list