Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 20:07 +0100, Kjartan Maraas wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> I've got a few reports in bugzilla with patches to add more schema >> entries in libgnome. Is it ok to keep adding API/ABI to these deprecated >> libs or should we seek to put them elsewhere? >> >> I guess we'll have to migrate the whole lot to some other place at some >> point anyway if we are to get rid of libgnome so adding a few more won't >> add much to the burden. >> >> - lockdown: Restrict Application Launching, default schema ... >> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395887 >> > > This one seems pretty remote from what would actually be needed, and > there's no patches for gnome-panel/nautilus to look at the > implementation. > > There are patches in bugzilla for gnome-panel, nautilus and pessulus for these keys : gnome-panel : http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394252 nautilus : http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397715 pessulus : http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394249
So not that remote i think.... Matt _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
