Hi Carlos, On Jan 10, 2008 5:10 AM, Carlos DiĆ³genes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to know why gnome-mag-0.15 wasn't included in this release?
Sorry, apparently someone (probably me) assumed that the stable release version numbers of gnome-mag would be 0.14.x and that 0.15 or higher would represent development releases for the 2.21 release cycle. The stable release scripts are set to ignore gnome-mag>=0.15 for the 2.20 stable cycle. I do apologize for the error. However, please also note that despite our best efforts, errors of this sort are likely to occur again (with other modules if not gnome-mag); there are hundreds of modules in GNOME and by not using GNOME major and minor version numbering, there's just too much room for human error. You can also take a look at http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/releng/trunk/tools/smoketesting/tarball-conversion-stable.config?view=markup and http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/releng/trunk/tools/smoketesting/tarball-conversion.config?view=markup to make sure the release team is using sane settings. We do our best to make them right, but limited time & natural human error means that we're not perfect. Unfortunately, fixing the stable one right now won't do any good as all the values will be modified again when 2.22 comes out. Hope that helps, Elijah _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list