On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:13:05PM +0200, Stefan Kost wrote: > > Install-module is not the only place where x.y.z is expected. I'm > > planning to rewrite install-module in Python and hopefully I can add > > something that handles the .0 case; together with .exe files. > > > > Note that it will be much stricter than currently (you can easily > > re-release the same version number). > > > Thanks for the info. Will a X.Y version scheme be supported, or should I > better > switch to a X.Y.Z scheme?
I'd appreciate a switch to x.y.z. I now know not to assume x.y.z and ensure x.y is possible (meaning: sort of works like now + changes/news.. but no diff). However, better to use x.y.z (then you know it is a minor change.. so install-module can assume a .diff is ok). The things I want to focus on is: - checking of sane versions (no 'rc1' 'beta1' etc) - sanity checking the tar.gz/bz2 (gtk+ had a release where the tar.gz was 2x bigger than it should be.. I want to be able to detect such things) - .exe (so people can easily upload - preparing possible GPG integration (allowing only known maintainers to upload their modules.. not about signing) - sha1 instead of md5 (but I have to discuss that) Blue sky: - lz/7z? -- Regards, Olav _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list