On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 01:45 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 25.06.08 19:07, William Jon McCann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > We can still support applications that only know if they should > > inhibit "just in time" by emitting a signal when a logout is > > requested. The applications can then take an inhibit in response to > > that signal. > > This part sounds racy. Is it? > > Apropos, since we are talking about session management here: have you > guys ever thought of reuseíng upstart for managing session processes? The > problem that an init system and a session manager have is the same: > doing lifecycle management of processes and all kinds of fancy > monitoring of them.
But session shutdown is interactive, and system shutdown isn't. That's a big difference. I also don't think that init systems have the concept of restoration. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
