on., 09.07.2008 kl. 08.25 +0000, skrev Stef: > Stef wrote: > > Kjartan Maraas wrote: > >> Well the objections were raised and still the code is in svn. This hit > >> me today when trying to build with jhbuild and we need to make a > >> decision whether vala is blessed as a dependency or not. I don't > >> personally have anything against this but I think the vala maintainers > >> need to chime in with some kind of guarantees for stability etc. > >> > >> Frederic added vala as a tarball to the modulesets so people can build > >> it to make seahorse build, but didn't add the dep yet. > > > > Hmm, I built seahorse module on a machine without vala, immediately > > after checking it in in order to test this. What are the messages you > > experienced when building without vala? That would help fix that bug. > > I've found a few problems, which I've fixed. My autofoo wasn't > completely correct for all corner cases. In addition 'make clean' > deleted some generated C code, and obviously with that gone, seahorse > would not build on machines without vala. These are now fixed in SVN. > > I'm eager to hear of any other problems building seahorse. The goal (at > least for the time being) is certainly to have it buildable without > vala. Apologies for the inconvenience this has caused. > Thank you very much for fixing these up. I'll leave the rest of the discussion up to those who actually have a stake in it :-)
Cheers Kjartan _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list