Il giorno mar, 04/11/2008 alle 15.21 +0100, Josselin Mouette ha scritto: > Le lundi 03 novembre 2008 à 23:48 +0100, Luca Ferretti a écrit :
> > Examples of backends are nautilus-cd-burner and brasero :-) OK, serious. > > >From UI point of view, backend is the the dialog showing you the > > progress of burning process, a software between the frontend and > > cd*tools. > > Yes. There are two separate things here: a real burning backend (which > currently is cdrtools/cdrkit and in the end should probably be libburn) > and a base UI. Of course, I wasn't speaking about "real" backends like cdr* or libburnia. > > * IMHO currently brasero (as "backend") is better then n-c-b, at > > least 'cause brasero provides multisession and > > blanking/formatting > > AFAIK n-c-b provides blanking. If so, there is no UI for this, in example a "Blank Disc" entry in Nautilus context menu for inserted disc, isn't it? > > * About the "frontend" I think could be good put burn:// location > > and brasero side by side in the desktop, having a simple > > Nautilus add-in to quickly burn stuff as well as a full featured > > (but not bloated) application > > What exactly can the brasero front-end do that n-c-b cannot? Shouldn’t > it be something that we could add to the n-c-b burn dialog? Josselin, I was speaking about "frontend", i.e. provide to the end user both this[1] and this[2] UIs to collect data to burn. [1] http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/wp-content/uploads/2006/07/autilus.png [2] http://www.gnome.org/projects/brasero/images/data-project.png _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
