On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Luis Villa <l...@tieguy.org> wrote: > > [1] I'm taking for granted that there are in fact no bug reports; I > really don't know and haven't looked in a long time, though certainly > virtually no reports were filed about docs by regular users when I was > active. >
There are a couple of gnome-user-docs bugs complaining about some of the things I listed. I don't know if they were filed by 'regular users'. Anyway, a simple alternative to a prolonged discussion about dropping docs and similar drastic measures is to just chime in and help making GNOME 2.26 the "best documented GNOME since 2.2". I have done patches for about half the problematic capplets this weekend. I'm sure if some more people are willing do update one section each, we can have 100% accurate docs by the end of the month. As Jon McCann pointed out to me, sitting down and trying to write docs for a piece of software is a valuable excercise for developers, since it teaches you just how bad some of our UIs are... Matthias _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list