On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 17:27 +0000, Mark Doffman wrote: > When moving to D-Bus AT-SPI how amenable are people to killing the Cspi > library? (This is a nasty one. It would require major changes to GOK)
Not volunteering of course ;-) but wouldn't it make more sense to work out what proportion of the cspi API is actually used by anyone [ gok ? dasher ? ]. My limited objdump -T grepping skill shows: SPI_ methods Accessible* methods dasher 5 9 mousetweaks 7 22 gok 15 78 libcspi 29 230 So - a compat libcspi that makes dasher & mousetweaks happy should be ~trivial, for gok it would be more work; but fairly do-able [ though I'm not volunteering ;-], and I guess we can throw much of the rest of libcspi out without over-many qualms [ or are there other apps using that ? ;-] Of course, the cspi port is also extremely mechanical work, potentially even script-able to some degree ;-) > When moving to D-Bus AT-SPI how amenable are people to deprecating Cspi? Sounds good to me; there is presumably a new / native GObject-like C binding that you're creating & exposing via python ? HTH, Michael. -- michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list