Am Dienstag, den 24.02.2009, 15:47 +0100 schrieb Vincent Untz: > Le mardi 24 février 2009, à 14:35 +0000, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro a écrit : > > Does GnomePrint no longer belong in the GNOME Desktop platform?
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/Desktop#upcoming_deprecations > We've been trying to remove libgnomeprint* for quite some time now. > Tomboy has been ported this cycle, so the bindings are the last steps, I > believe. To be exact: gnome-python-desktop and gnome-games (the latter to be ported for 2.27.1, see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=564655 ). > > Does GnomeVFS no longer belong in the GNOME Developer platform? http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyfive/Platform#upcoming_deprecations > > In case of Yes, would it be OK to keep the Python bindings where they > > are and just mark them as deprecated? Else they'd have to move into > > gnome-python-extras, I guess... > > For gnome-vfs, marking the bindings as deprecated makes sense, since > gnome-vfs is still part of the platform at the moment. The only modules still requiring gnome-vfs are: * dasher: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572134 * gnome-mag through its libcolorblind dependency * gnome-python * gnome-utils: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=543713 * probably some other deprecated modules like libgnome/ui That's all, and I hope gnome-vfs will die for 2.27.1, too. andre -- mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed http://www.iomc.de/ | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list