On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 11:20 -0400, Tristan Van Berkom wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Dan Winship <d...@gnome.org> wrote: > [...] > > So, actually, what exactly IS the use case of ChangeLog if there is git > > history on one end and NEWS on the other? Who are the people who need > > more information than NEWS gives, but who would not want to actually > > check out the source tree, and what information, exactly, do they need? > > Generally its the tarball that is published and trusted, not the git > repository.
Given that tags can be signed in Git, shouldn't it be about time that we move to a more modern way of trust, one that maintains a 1:1 mapping between changelog and changes? Kind regards, Ruben -- Ruben Vermeersch (rubenv) http://www.savanne.be/ _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
