On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 23:15 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > Are you going to argue that this branch is desirable to keep alive for > all eternity? > http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gedit/log/?h=CORBA_ENABLED
I think most reasonable people will say that there is a difference between branches which were used for development forks and have been merged (such as this, "feature branches" in git), and maintenance branches such as gnome-2-26. Feature branches which have been merged can and probably should be killed from the repository unless there is a reason to keep them, but long term maintenance branches should be preserved. Ross -- Ross Burton mail: r...@burtonini.com jabber: r...@burtonini.com www: http://burtonini.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list