On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Hubert Figuiere <h...@figuiere.net> wrote: > On 05/12/2009 08:01 PM, Robert Carr wrote: >> >> For 2.28, it may make sense to have both gjs and Seed as modules, and >> try and keep code somewhat compatible. >> >> It's still not entirely clear which JavaScript engine is going to end >> up being better long term, so we might not want to completely commit >> to one yet. > > > With that plan, it is -1 from me. 2 engines is one too many IMHO.
We'll have two engines if Epiphany moves to webkit and gnome-shell sticks with gjs. If the only user of gjs in GNOME is gnome-shell, and the gnome-shell developers are happy with a move to Seed (have we heard from them on this yet?), then I am +1 for Seed's inclusion and gjs' exclusion. I agree with Hubert that sending mixed messages about browser/js engines is not a good idea. Sandy _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list