On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 22:13 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote: > Here is the point, as I see it. g-d-u is proposed for inclusion in > 2.28.
Please read http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2009-May/msg00016.html where I've already stated upfront that the deps for gnome-disk-utility is bleeding edge, why this is so and why that won't change. Also note that the proposal for inclusion of gnome-disk-utility in 2.28 is dependent on this not being a problem. If it's a problem, maybe we shouldn't consider gnome-disk-utility at all for 2.28 (I'm not in a hurry to finish it anyway; it will see API breakage for a while). If distros, such as Fedora, wants to use gnome-disk-utility they can just include it themselves. And jhbuild / more conservative distros can use the HAL GVfs backend, it works just fine. Of course there's a bunch of features / stuff you won't get but such is life if you are using a conservative distro. David _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list