On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Dave Neary<dne...@gnome.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Matteo Settenvini wrote: > > Unless you are a lawyer, shouldn't you qualify that with "IANAL"? By who > is the exception "thought just to mean"?
Sorry, didn't want to sound too harsh or imperative. > > The exception was initially added to allow GNU applications to run on > proprietary Unix systems, with proprietary libc and system libraries. > Since OpenGL-ES is typically included with the system in embedded > environments which support it as part of the standard system, it seems > to me like the exception applies. But IANAL. IANAL too, but I'm not sure it fits. It's questionable if it is a system component you can't live without, like glibc. However, that's just my opinion. I apologize, -- Matteo Settenvini FSF Associated Member Email : mat...@member.fsf.org _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
