On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 16:08 -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Karl Lattimer <k...@qdh.org.uk> > wrote: > That's not arrogant, arrogant would be someone making a > sweeping > statement like nobody uses solaris so lets just not care about > it, when > no evidence is provided to back that up. > > Are you really going to make the argument that Solaris does have a > non-trivial desktop install user base? What exactly are you getting > at? Or you decided you'd like to add flames? > > If I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt that you are not > giving me (I know quite a lot about Sun, by the way), then my > suggestion to you--if you are serious about pursuing this line of > reasoning--would be to Google some Solaris browser statistics.
Giving >ME< the benefit of the doubt? I just stepped in to correct the insult you threw at Alberto. I'm not arguing one way or the other, but you clearly are. Being argumentative that is... BR, K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
