On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 20:59, Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> wrote: > Hi Tomeu, > > On Thu 14 Jan 2010 16:29, Tomeu Vizoso <to...@sugarlabs.org> writes: > >> Pygi is still far away from being an usable replacement of static >> bindings, at the current development rate. > > Why is that? Is the gobject-inspection metadata not expressive enough, > or does pygi not implement all that gobject-introspection can express?
Pygi is incomplete, I don't think there is still an enormous amount of work to be done, but there's almost zero people with time to work on it currently. If there's interest, I can add a TODO list to the wiki. As far as I know, g-i has everything we need now. Regards, Tomeu > Just curious, > > Andy > -- > http://wingolog.org/ > -- «Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar. What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David Farning _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list