Hi, On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Colin Walters <walt...@verbum.org> wrote: > We've made a good > amount of progress in allowing Vala to be rebased on introspection as > well (though there is one major blocker still left for that).
The nested namespace issue you mentioned below? > 1) gir-repository should be dead - people please stop depending on it. > It's pretty high priority for me to get gnome-shell switched over to > the GTK+ introspection built stack. Isn't death of gir-repository awaiting for moving all gir/typelib to respective libraries rather than for applications to stop depending on gir-repository? > 2) API/ABI stability. I'm going to try really hard on this. If we end > up doing nested namespaces for Vala some things will get harder, > but we'll see. Talking of namespaces, is it correct that gir does not allow multiple libs to share a namespace? If so, that could be bigger issue than not supporting nested namespaces AFAICT. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list