On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 08:55 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 00:37 +0100, Lucas Rocha wrote: > > > > 1. The arbitrary separation between Platform and Bindings can lead > > people to > > think that the bindings are second-class citizens while this is > > certainly not > > the case. > > However: > a) The Platform set clearly tells the Bindings what needs to be bound. > > b) As long as the release team don't follow their own rules about the > Bindings then the Bindings will not have the same prestige. Specific > examples not mentioned here to avoid distraction. > > c) Throwing them all into one big module set won't make the distros any > more likely to package them with the same amount of love.
I agree with this. Do modulesets need to be disjoined? Otherwise Bindings could become a subset of Platform... Cheers, Simon _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list