On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 03:05, John Stowers <john.stowers.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> A separate but related issue is that unless somebody plans to update >> gtk-sharp, Tomboy may not be GTK3 compatible this cycle (I don't know >> off-hand what parts of gtk-sharp may be incompatible with GTK3). Do >> other non-C apps have similar issues, or is this just a problem with >> the Mono bindings? > > AFAIK (and please correct me if I am wrong), but the story is the same > for PyGtk; it builds against Gtk-2.0 and not 3.0. > > * What does this mean for Python apps and GNOME 3.0 / 2.31
To the best of my knowledge, nobody has stepped yet to make PyGtk work with Gtk+ 3.0. But PyGI's goal is to work with both 2.0 and 3.0, provided the needed annotation fixes are accepted in the 2.0 branch. Regards, Tomeu > There is also the case of apps like Rhythmbox, Totem, Gedit, that > support PyGtk plugins > > * Will these apps lose plugin support this cycle? > > John > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list