On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Claudio Saavedra <csaave...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 12:55 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: >> >> - just release a new 2.30.x release with additional fixes: this is >> perfectly fine, especially if the development in master is >> explicitly targerted at GNOME 3. A good example here is gedit. > > This can be problematic if a module has already released a 2.31.x > tarball. Releasing 2.30.x now means going back in the version number and > this can be problematic for distributors. >
What I would recommend in that case is to create a 2.32 branch off 2.30, and move master to 2.90. But I would not worry too much about distributors, we can generally handle version discontinuities (even if it is not nice and requires epochs and such). Matthias _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list