On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Frederic Crozat <f...@crozat.net> wrote:
> Except almost nobody ship spidermonkey that way (I used to package it > separately years ago in Mandrake) but it didn't last long and there > was very few (ie one or two) using it and no maintenance on it by > upstream. Actually we're discussing this upstream again very productively; there's renewed interest in supporting embedders, and I'm in the process of getting some patches in to help here. > Forking spidermonkey would mean code duplication in distributions and > moreover, library code would not be shared in memory between firefox > and gjs (but I might be wrong on this). True. > Using xulrunner as a "basis", providing libmozjs.so isn't sufficient ? No, because it couples gnome-shell to tightly to firefox basically. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
