2010/12/28 Sergey Udaltsov <sergey.udalt...@gmail.com>

> > What you want is not Gnome 3 then. You want to continue using Gnome 2
> > and there's no one preventing you from doing that.
> So, why bother maintaining gnome2 support mode at all? "go to hell,
> just do not upgrade" is unbeatable argument, I must admit.
>

I think though it might be initially painful not having applets.  But if you
look at what applets are available they seem fairly repetitious.  The
exception for me personally is the system monitor applet which I think is
very useful as apps do spin out of control or take a lot of memory.  That
can be addressed once libgtop is converted to gobject-introspection so we
can get JavaScript bindings.

But over next couple of releases after 3.0, we should be able to get people
to start writing useful extensions to bridge gaps from the old applets to
shell extensions.  I think the lack of applets will be a little tricky to
manage from a release perspective since there are clearly many people like
yourself that are alarmed that such a functionality is being removed and it
will be important to underline the context on why it is removed before
things start taking a negative spin in media.

It will be important to get people writing extensions before the release
happens i think.  (sorry went into marketing mode...!)


> Actually, your advice effectively stops people from upgrading their
> distros, unless the distro choses to support both gnome2 and gnome3 -
> which I'm afraid will not be the case for most of them. To be fair,
> gnome2+3 maintenance may be not trivial, at least GNOME does not
> bother separating binaries by name.
>


I think in this case, if you don't meet the requirements that it might be
better not to upgrade till Gnome 3 hits feature parity.  I don't know what
the world looks like these days in terms of computer capabilities.  I don't
want to see us alienate large swathes of our 3% desktop market share. :-)

There should be some idea though on how to convert such users to gnome 3 at
some point, and that might be something something as simply improving things
so that they do work comfortably.  I remember it took quite a while for
nautilus to be where it is today.

My two cents.

sri
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to