On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 15:52 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: > On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 13:53 +0100, Kenneth Nielsen wrote: > > I'm interested to know what is going to happen about the module set > > reorganization now. We had the second proposal presented, we had a > > HUGE discussion about pros and cons with a lot of different views on > > this. So now what? > > > > - Will this be implemented? > > - If so when? > > - Or will there be another iteration with another proposal and discussion? > [snip] > > I am also very concerned that there has been no further announcement > about this, and no response to the concerns raised, though the recent > releases show at least some, though not all, of these changes. > > What is happening? Maintainers deserve to know.
Taking just the bindings, for example, you seem to have done this without bothering to inform the affected maintainers - Dropped all bindings apart from C++ (gtkmm and co). - And volunteered gtkmm for slightly stronger API/ABI and release-frequency rules. -- murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list