On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 22:35, Chris Kühl <blix...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Joseph Pingenot > <gnome-...@digitasaru.net> wrote: >> From Chris Kühl on Monday, 24 January, 2011: >>>On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Matthias Clasen >>><matthias.cla...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hey, >>>> we are shipping a single gtkmm application in the meta-gnome-core >>>> moduleset: gnome-system-monitor. It is nice to showcase our C++ >>>> bindings in this way, and a system-monitor is certainly a utility that >>>> one would expect as part of the desktop. Unfortunately, it is still >>>> using the 2.x bindings, and there has been no action at all to port it >>>> to the bindings that we are actually going to include in GNOME 3. >>>> So, the release team is looking for a volunteer to take on porting >>>> gnome-system-monitor to gtk3. This should not be all that much work, >>>> and there are some patches in bugzilla already. >>>> Please coordinate with the maintainers before diving in (I've cc'ed them >>>> here). >>>I'd like to tackle the port to the 3.0 bindings as Murray has given >>>the ok to use Openismus time on this. I can start looking into it and >>>talking to the maintainers tomorrow. >> >> Sounds like you're the better option; mind if I give you some patches? :) > > Not at all. I'll see what I've gotten myself into when I take a closer > look at the code tomorrow. As andre said on IRC, we should use the > following bugs to avoid duplicate work. > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=625883,627568,632799,622928,613752
Is the plan to go for gtk3-only or to keep compatibility for gtk2? Would it be reasonable to start landing the patches from bugzilla in a branch? _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list