Il giorno gio, 12/05/2011 alle 19.12 -0400, Matthias Clasen ha scritto: > This is really starting to drift into a highly emotional and > non-productive direction.
I'm not emotional, just a little overemphatic :) > Not allowing random third parties to put their pet projects > preferences into the very core of GNOME is very different from > censorship. It is maintaining meaningful boundaries between what is > GNOME and what is not. Then, as I said on another reply, why are gnome-shell extensions allowed to change gnome-shell so deeply[1]? More, why is gnome-shell providing support to extensions? BTW "pet project"... IMHO "pet" is something that plays down the merits, isn't it? [1] see http://intgat.tigress.co.uk/rmy/extensions/index.html _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list