On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 13:56 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:45:10PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > Note that release-team-lurkers is a test. We will remove the entire > > > mailing list if we think it has a bad effect. > > > > You could also have made the mailing-list private, and subscribed gmane > > to it. That way the archives would be accessible to the majority without > > resorting to having to setup a new mailing-list. > > This was the easiest&nicest solution due to secur...@gnome.org. > > secur...@gnome.org should automatically go to all release-team subscribers > > To avoid any differences in receivers of security@ and release-team@, > the security@ has been setup to automatically send it to everyone > subscribed in release-team@. > > As security@ could be rather critical (in practice 99%+ of all emails are > spam), I preferred keeping this distinction. > > Another benefit is that we can easily get rid of the lurkers list, and > make clear that there is a difference between being a release-team > member and following the release-team emails. > > Further, we cannot change release-team to private. People are allowed to > email release-team and raise issues. We just don't want anyone other > than release-team to respond. > > Maybe I should've stressed the last bit more...
All good points, thanks for going into details. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list