Dave Neary wrote: <snip> > In general I'm interested in how dogmatic the "use GNOME infrastructure" > requirement is, in the case of each team what the reasons & motivations > are, and how we can integrate personal preferences of module maintainers > & translators for things like bug trackers & translation infrastructure > (in the same way that git2svn allowed developers to commit to git for > GNOME modules, even before GNOME had migrated). </snip>
I agree that we shouldn't be dogmatic about this. That said, I do think that it is important for a core module to use GNOME Bugzilla. These components are supposed to be developed and presented as integrated parts of the system. That makes using a common issue tracking system important. Speaking personally, I can't imagine being able to effectively work on Deja Dup/Backup if it doesn't use GNOME Bugzilla. It would be good to have a debate about this if anyone disagrees though. It's important to be pragmatic where desirable functionality is concerned. Allan -- Blog: http://afaikblog.wordpress.com/ IRC: aday on irc.gnome.org _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
