On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Luc Pionchon <pionchon....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 18:35, Felipe Contreras > <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> After going through all the feedback, here's the second version of the >> proposed survey. >> >> There is a proposal to delay the survey until 3.2 is released, to try >> to avoid some of the initial negative feedback of 3.0, I guess. If >> this is delayed for 3.2, perhaps there could be a small piece of >> software that pops up a notification for this, and perhaps some >> notifications in the future. >> >> What do you think? > > minor points below inline, > Sorry if some points were already discussed in the previous long > thread, just discard > >> >> === 01. Which of the following images best resemble your desktop? === >> (images of various desktops) >> >> * GNOME 2 >> * GNOME 3 >> * Unity >> * KDE >> >> === 02. Overall, how happy are you with GNOME? === >> (single choice) >> >> * unhappy >> * not so happy >> * happy >> * very happy >> * completely ecstatic > > I would merge the two last ones, so positive and negative are > balanced, and so there is no middle choice: > > * unhappy > * not so happy > * happy > * completely happy
That's fine by me, but I think it doesn't have a bigger spectrum. >> === 03. Which GNOME version(s) are you using? === >> (multiple choice, with other) >> >> + 3.2 >> + 3.0 >> + 2.20 - 2.32 >> + 2.10 - 2.19 >> + 2.0 - 2.9 >> + pre 2.0 > > I would merge the above into: > + 3.2 > + 3.0 > + 2.x Also fine by me. >> + not using it currently >> >> + other, please specify >> >> === 04. How long have you been using GNOME? (years) === >> (numeric) >> >> === 05. How do you compare your current GNOME version with the version >> from one year ago? === >> (single choice) >> >> * better >> * no changes >> * worse >> >> * cannot say > > assuming some persons answering may not use GNOME 3, wouldn't the > results of this question be difficult to sort out? No? I don't see how. Either they will answer "cannot say", or they would answer something that should be taken with a grain of salt. Fortunately those users would be identified. >> === 06. Does GNOME do what you want? === >> (single choice) >> >> * Everything >> * Mostly >> * Somewhat >> * Barely >> * Not at all >> >> === 07. How happy are you with GNOME in regards to == >> (matrix) >> >> Columns: unhappy / not so happy / happy / very happy / completely ecstatic > > about the columns, same remark as above. > >> + ease of use >> + documentation >> + language availability >> + accessibility > > + distraction free I don't think that's category broad enough. >> === 08. Which other desktop environments have you used in recent years? == >> (multiple choice, with other) >> >> + KDE >> + Unity >> + XFCE >> + LXDE >> + Enlightenment >> >> + other (please specify) >> >> === 09. How often do you use terminal/console? == >> >> * What is that? > > I would clarify into: > * I don't know what it is > * I never use it > >> * When I have no other option > > I think it is missing this category : > * regularly for specific tasks Maybe. The purpose of this question wasn't to accurately identify the way they use the terminal, but just to get a feeling if they are geeks or not. >> * I can't leave without them >> * Is there anything else? >> >> === 10. Does GNOME include code or documentation by you? === > > or "any contribution by you"? > I think there's more than just code and doc in GNOME. Actually I forgot to update this one: Does GNOME include contributions by you? >> (single choice) >> >> * Yes >> * No >> >> === 11. Have you contacted the GNOME team? === >> >> * Yes, successfuly > > s/fuly/fully/ ? True. >> * No, I don't know how >> * No, never had the need >> >> === 12. If you could change three things in GNOME what would they be? === >> (free form) >> >> === 13. Do you have any comments or suggestions for the GNOME team? === >> (free form) Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
