Hi, On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Vincent Untz <vu...@gnome.org> wrote: > Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011, à 00:37 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) a écrit : >> Hi everyone, >> As most of you know, we proposed Boxes for 3.4 and from what I can >> tell, there were no big objections in the end. There was then the >> question of us actually delivering in time. As seen on planet GNOME >> not long after that, we delivered the first release which was included >> in 3.3.2. There is still a long way ahead to make Boxes the awesome >> app that we all would like it to be but to ensure that Boxes is in >> good enough shape for 3.4 inclusion in time, we would like to know a >> few things: >> >> * which features exactly are must? >> * is the plan to keep vinagre in 3.4 alongside boxes? >> * is Boxes going to be a 'preview' feature in 3.4 like Documents was in 3.2? >> >> Release team? everyone? > > I'm sorry, but I still have the same objection :-) And talking to a few > people, I understood that I'm not alone in feeling that Boxes might not > fit core GNOME (even as a core app [1]).
Can you be more specific about the reasons for your objection? Do you feel the same way about Vinagre? > [1] http://live.gnome.org/Design/Apps -- just to give an example: I feel > that a backup tool makes more sense than boxes as a core app, imho. And > the wiki says that such a tool is very likely not a core app but would > make a great regular app. Really, this shouldn't be a competition between Backup and Boxes. There are a number of reasons why Backup is in (for now) in the prospective section. None of which are really on topic for this thread. Jon _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list