On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) <zeesha...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Andrew Cowie > <and...@operationaldynamics.com> wrote: >> We're getting *ransacked* out there in discussions in LUGs around the >> world (e.g. [1]) because power users are trying GNOME 3 have found it >> totally interferes with their accustomed workflows. Unhappy campers. If >> people in LUGs have the idea that GNOME 3 is no use for them, do you >> really think they're going to push for its adoption in the wider company >> that they have to support? >> >> So the whole discussion about whether Boxes is core or not is >> ridiculous. If it meets the standards of being a good GNOME app (HIG, oh >> HIG, where art thou HIG) then it should be endorsed and promoted. >> Period. > > While I greatly appreciate your support for Boxes here, I must inform > you that Boxes is *not* targeted for IT professionals. For that we > have virt-manager and oVirt.
Don't get me wrong please. I'm sure Boxes *will* satisfy many IT professionals as well and we will try our best to support their use-cases as long as those use-cases do not conflict with that of a typical end-user. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list