On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 20:51, Jason D. Clinton <m...@jasonclinton.com> wrote: > > My question to you would be, why didn't agreement ever get reached? Why, > four years later, are we stillĀ arguingĀ about desktop activity? I see a > failure of cooperation; not of the design team's but rather of the whole > project's.
Wonder if besides improving in-project cooperation, we shouldn't make it easier as well for people with diverging ideas to prove that they are right. I see how it can be a problem for the GNOME brand if individual distros ship too big modifications to the upstream, official GNOME releases, but giving the chance to people to push forward their ideas if they believe in them has also its value. Innovation happens as convergence after divergence, if we stress the first too much, our capacity to innovate slows down. Regards, Tomeu _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list