On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Evandro Giovanini <efgiovan...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Xan Lopez <x...@gnome.org> wrote: >> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Andrew Cowie >> <and...@operationaldynamics.com> wrote: >>> Is there a reference application doing this right? >>> >>> I ask this because Epiphany¹ has no menu, but does and a funky button >>> over on the right that, upon investigation, turns out to be a menu has >>> useful things like "add bookmark" ... but not preferences! Which, >>> eventually and quite by accident, I discovered was in the global GMenu >>> thing up top. Oh. >> >> The way it was designed is that things related to the application as a >> whole go in the application menu, things related to the particular >> window you are in go in the gear thing. I'm not sure about what you >> mean exactly with "Epiphany has no menu" in any case. >> >>> >>> Presumably that's not quite what you're aiming for. Perhaps you can >>> suggest a current GNOME app that *is* doing precisely what it is you >>> want us all to do? >> >> The design we have is not exactly like what it's implemented, since >> there's a few things in the gear menu that should not be there. The >> fact that there's a global app menu and a window specific menu is >> implemented as designed, though. >> >> > > I think having two different "super" menus could be confusing, the > distinction between application and window is not something people > think about. > > An example of how this can be a problem is the "View as List/Grid" > menu items in Documents. These exact same options exist in Nautilus, > but they would live in the menubar or a super menu instead of the > appmenu. Per-window/per-app makes sense from a technical perspective > but it's not a natural to users.
The menu that is currently in the Web toolbar contains a fairly broad array of items, as reflected by the cog (or gear) icon that labels it - it basically means 'do something'. If I understand them correctly, the mockups [1] call for something different - a share menu. This would have a much more focused role and its scope would be clearer. It would also only be shown when displaying web pages rather than the 'pages' view - ie. it is contextual and displayed on-demand (as opposed to the cog menu that is always shown). This distinction between app menus that are global and always available and focused options that are displayed on-demand when context requires it is a key one for the design of the new applications. So in this case, I don't think the distinction between the app menu and any other menus is ambiguous (as designed, at least). Allan [1] https://live.gnome.org/Design/Apps/Web/#Tentative_Design -- IRC: aday on irc.gnome.org Blog: http://afaikblog.wordpress.com/ _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list