> not that bad? right. it's the worst case to CJK users. > > then you can only reply on mouth input like disabled persons. > > although GNOME is really good at such technologies. > > that's not what we want. All of you seem to assume that breakage/regression must happen. I don't think so. On the other hand, I've experienced so many regressions in FOSS but I'm still enthusiastic about FOSS.
> like I said, what you think does not even matter. > > all other emails are based on facts. yours, theory. > > so please don't flood this ML any more. > > it'll give GNOME developers bad impression of the whole CJK community. I don't think you gave so many insightful facts beyond IBus sucks and fcitx rocks. I never learn that many facts. As a user, I'd say I don't care underlying technology. I'd point out that I don't particular preference over IBus. Ubuntu 12.04 comes with IBus and I use it. On CentOS 5.5, I compile fcitx 3.x and use it. They are both inferior to current fcitx 4.x but they are acceptable for me. I guess uniform input method UX like that of Mac OS X and Windows is the real goal. If fcitx rocks, let's use it. As a developer, I'd care about theory. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list