On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Takao Fujiwara <tfuji...@redhat.com> wrote: > (05/15/12 15:28), Marguerite Su-san wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Takao Fujiwara<tfuji...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm working on the ibus integration. >>> >>> >>> (05/13/12 13:31), Justin Wong-san wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Well this is how ibus is done, as u can see, ugly. >>>> >>>> but i should say users would never see this long long menu, because >>>> this >>>> menu provides 13 kinds of input methods for users, where normal users >>>> use >>>> less than 3 input methods, this screenshot is just to show ibus can >>>> provide so many IMs.... >>> >>> >>> >>> The long menu has been enhanced in the latest ibus-gjs gtk3-vala branch. >>> But >>> it still do not work in other distros because we're discussing how the >>> internal patches are resolved. >>> Probably the latest will be available for other distros soon. >>> We're still discussing the better UI. >>> >>>> > https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/261/kimpanel/ >>>> > >>>> https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/68/input-method-status-indicator/ >>> >>> >>> >>> Sorry, it's a bit old as I explained above. >>> It would miss some important features against the last ibus-gjs. E.g. >>> using >>> libgnomekbd and preloaded xkb engines. >>> Yes, ibus-gjs does not support fcitx because upstream suggests to pick up >>> one input method as the implementation itself would be possible. >>> >> >> Welcome! fujuwara, as IBus developer! >> >> I'm glad to see this thread diversified. >> >> that sounds a little sad to me actually. >> >> then others really have to reinvent the wheels...and if deep >> integrated, to reinvent the wheels really hard. > > > Currently I suggest an option to check ibus-1.0.pc in configure.ac whether > gnome-shell enables ibus or not. > So probably I think the default recommended IMF would be ibus but it can be > configured by each distros. > I'm also thinking ibus-gjs provides the same UI with keyboard indicator when > ibus-daemon is not running. > > >> >>> fujiwara >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> desktop-devel-list mailing list >>> desktop-devel-list@gnome.org >>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list >> >> >> >
Hi, fujiwara! hugs and thanks with all my heart! it's totally acceptable to me and distribution. you saved the world again! _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list