On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Luc Pionchon <pionchon....@gmail.com> wrote: > The main point is that so-called "controversial" features does not have to > be either a hard default, either rotting in a branch. They can be shipped as > default, but with a way to revert them in the case they block the user.
Wait - are you suggesting to create a fork each time a controversial change is made? How does that scale? _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
