On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 13:02 +0000, Debarshi Ray wrote: > > If you look at > http://blogs.office.com/b/microsoft-outlook/archive/2013/09/12/outlook-com-now-with-imap.aspx > (which is linked from the feature page), then the other alternative is > EAS or Exchange ActiveSync [1] not EWS.
Those are the protocols they've *added* to support mobile access, AFAICT. But they *already* supported EWS natively, and that is the protocol they support best. EWS is a much richer protocol than ActiveSync, and Microsoft's IMAP implementations have always been broken. Seriously, if EWS is available then just use it. Although I *would* like to see Evolution's ActiveSync support get a higher profile :) -- dwmw2
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list