On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 11:24 -0500, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> I mean, copylibs have existed forever, usually by just copying files
> around from project A to project B, and back from project B to project
> A. Why does structuring this process in a git submodule make it
> suddenly illegal in Fedora review?
> 

I cannot speak for Fedora but ARAIK the packagers don't like bundles as
if you have security issue with library X you need to track and find all
users instead of patching in one place. In addition you might get symbol
collisions if you are not careful.

> I'm quite opposed to making gsystem a shared library. libgsystem is,
> to me, 1) a way to put non-portable Linux-specific or gcc-specific
> stuff, 2) a staging ground for GLib components, for projects that want
> to get real-world usage before they land in GLib. And I'm sort of not
> a fan of 2), since it means that there's no motivation to get stuff
> into GLib (think of all the churn that happened with GSubprocess).
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Debarshi Ray <rishi...@lostca.se>
> wrote:
>         On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 03:21:06PM +0000, Colin Walters wrote:
>         > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Jasper St. Pierre
>         > <jstpie...@mecheye.net> wrote:
>         > >
>         > > What was the issue that happened in Fedora package review?
>         Why
>         > > doesn't it apply to our copylibs right now, or e.g. libgd?
>         > >
>         > I think no one noticed libgd...review only happens on
>         initial
>         > submission, there's no real rigorous ongoing process (I
>         won't comment
>         > on the sanity of this model now).
>         
>         
>         Packages using libgd often have 'Provides: bundled(libgd)' in
>         their
>         spec files.
>         
>         Cheers,
>         Debarshi
>         
>         --
>         Wearing non-prescription glasses and embracing obscurity
>         doesn't
>         necessarily make you a hipster.  -- Anonymous
>         _______________________________________________
>         desktop-devel-list mailing list
>         desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
>         https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
>   Jasper
> 
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to