On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 17:11 +0100, Sébastien Wilmet wrote: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 04:51:32PM +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > > Devhelp could also have a 'next' or 'latest' default profile which could > > sync the daily? built documentation from gnome.org. Although not sure > > how useful this could be if we setup the default jhbuild-based profile. > > > > I personally think that the profiles idea could be a good one, also as a > > first step for the next stuff. What do others think? > > Having only the 'latest' profile should be sufficient for most > developers, for each major version of a library of course (e.g. the > latest gtk 2.x and the latest gtk 3.x). Each symbol has the "Since: > <version>" information anyway. And by having the latest documentations, > developers are aware of new features and don't reinvent the wheel or > don't use APIs that are already deprecated since a later version. > > But 'latest' should have two variants: stable and unstable. > > Of course, having other profiles for specific versions of GNOME would be > nice, but the 'latest' profiles should be the default and recommended in > my opinion.
I believe there are various APIs where the ‘Since’ annotations have not been, and are not, added correctly. I suspect we will have to aim for having profiles for each minor release of each library — but that should not be any more complex than supporting latest stable and latest unstable profiles, which I think is a great idea. One question: does ‘latest unstable’ mean git master, or the latest release in the unstable branch? There are plenty of times I’ve needed documentation for unreleased functions newly added in git master; I can’t think of any time I’ve needed documentation for the latest unstable release instead. Philip
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
