Hi, Philip Withnall wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 11:07 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: > > I'm a bit surprised by 1) but we could certainly automatically > > produce > > a list of maintainers / modules/ time/commits since last release, if > > that could be useful. > > I think 1) would be useful because I have a load of modules which I am > not sure if they need to follow the main GNOME release schedule. I had > a nagging fear they should, but then nobody poked me about doing a > release, so I forgot to check up further. As a result, a lot of my > modules haven’t had releases following the schedule. (Sorry if I have > been a total pain because of this.) > > Would such a list be useful for the release team, as a way of tracking > who needs nagging? If so, then I hope producing it should not be too > much of a drain on your time — if it is a drain, then you probably > shouldn’t do it. This was mostly done manually (at least as far I am concerned), but here is an experiment, https://people.gnome.org/~fpeters/health/wanted-releases.html And the red modules are first targets. (this has been generated from my local clones, updated a few hours ago, if it's something we want to pursue it would be quite nice to have this automated and running on GNOME infrastructure) (the disk requirements exclude openshift). Fred [code at https://git.gnome.org/browse/releng/tree/tools/health/] _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
