On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 13:32 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Ah, yeah, we should not be reverting entire large sequences of > commits... I agree that would be excessive. In cases like this, we > can > tag your module in Continuous and branch it in jhbuild, until other > modules have caught up with your API changes. Build sheriffs should > try > the least-disruptive option possible to get things fixed.
We could also keep a list of maintainers who request that we not touch their modules directly, so we know to branch and tag your module when something breaks instead of committing to it directly. I suspect not many maintainers will opt-in to this, but you've made it clear there is demand! Michael _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
