On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 08:15:19AM +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > So, I want to stop this thread on my side because not only is making > me not want to contribute anything ever again, but it also is > absolutely pointless busy work that relies on two people architecture > astronauting without the minimal intention of building anything or > even consensus.
Citing myself from several mails ago: "With master/master-stable, it's a more relaxed atmosphere." https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2016-June/msg00002.html There is a proposal that is simple to understand: when tagging a module in GContinuous, this would mirror what jhbuild builds by default. With a branch. That's it. Then there are more complicated proposals where everything is fully automated, delivering a stable desktop continuously to end users. I didn't talk about it, but it would enable to do canary releasing and A/B testing. And there is a gray scale between those two proposals. -- Sébastien _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
