On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 10:28 -0400, Carlos Soriano via desktop-devel- list wrote: > Hello Hubert, > > [...] > 2- what are the migration plans for bugzilla: bugzilla URL, bug > numbers and the actual content > In the wiki we outline what our plans are. However this is a moving > target based on the input we receive here. > We have to find a balance between how much reasonable effort would > one way to migrate or the other vs the benefits. Also, different > projects might have different needs for migration. > [...]
From the migration plan in the wiki: "Our contention is that copying/moving every existing GNOME issue to a new issue tracker is impractical and, in many situations, undesirable." May you expand in which many situations is undesirable? I can foresee unmaintained projects, but I clearly am missing more cases. For (semi-)maintained projects bugzilla is a database of "wisdom", which is practical to find duplicated reports, for example, repetitive bugs, and more importantly, the rationale behind WONTFIX issues because of design decisions. Does the plan consider a tool like bugzilla2gitlab, but removing the part that copy the accounts? -- Germán Poo-Caamaño http://calcifer.org/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list